Home
  • linkedin
  • français

Culture

Hermann Hesse: the wings of the idler

May 3rd, 2016

Hermann Hesse

A bit overworked by the past few months learning code and web's customs, I recently felt in my favorite bookstore on the wise and calm book I needed : "L'art de l'oisiveté", from Hermann Hesse (which could be translated as "the art of idleness", but I couldn't find any english publishing available). His chronicles about culture, nature and travels echoe this blog with an amazing modernity.

Until now, Hermann Hesse meant to me "Steppenwolf" and "Siddhartha", two of my favorite books as a teenager. I remember used to underline almost every line. His existentialist reflections talked to me, they escorted my doubts with perfection.

Today (a few years later), I avoid dragging my doubts and discover "L'art de l'oisiveté", which is now responding to my actual concerns with the same accuracy and spirituality.

This book covers words, chronicles, letters, reflections on man's relations to nature, culture or travels. It is so modern, that it seems that nothing has changed under the sun (beside some toxic fine particles and a damaged ozone, the warming, hundreds of species disappearing, some minor events as you know…). Ok, but some texts are more than a hundred years old, most of them were written during the twenties.

So whether the guy was really ahead of its time, or we haven't made any progress for more than a century, and this makes me a bit angry.
Well, Hesse had definitely a reflection ahead, and whatever the time, humanity unfortunately doesn't move or change with books. The trend and the acceleration of scientific and technological advances are still current, but the nature and consequences of this progress have changed.
He regrets for example (…) that our smallest distractions are now affected by modern impatience et invites to enjoy the modest pleasures of existence. Basically : we should enjoy present time, be contemplative and open to every events, whether they are natural ou cultural.

We feel concerned when he makes fun of travelers or artists taking over a city or landscape ("so authentic!!!") and modeling it their way. He says, speaking of mountains, lakes and skies, that each of them is like us a part of a whole, a form that manifests an idea, we have to move among them, using our own capabilities and specific cultural and personal means, whether we are an artist, a naturalist or a philosopher. This is our deep soul, not only our physical body, that has to feel connected and integrated to the Whole.

'Hare Krishna', are you saying. Yes, he also loved indian culture but no... We're also close to buddhism but this is more about the rise of a freedom linked to our belonging to nature : in every man sleeps the forgotten communion. He feels it just once again and he may laugh at the poet, the painter and the park ranger, widely open his senses and soul to the outside world and get fullfilled by the breath of creation.

An this is my point : he preaches humility, the sense of the experience, the man as the animal in its natural environment, the way this blog is modestly trying to!
Even his words about music invoke nature and our personal experience, "Nuits d'insomnies" reconciles us with endless nights, and "Recueillement" is one of the most beautiful texts about being forty that I've been offered to read.

This essential work is full of universality. Nobel Prize for Literature in 1946, I think Hermann Hesse would have excelled in writing this blog !

PS: the title of this post sounds a bit like a good video game, don't you think ?

Culture

"The Revenant": about human nature

March 18, 2016

The Revenant

The last feature of Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu isn't a contemplative return to good nature but a carnivorous fight of the man against himself… tough and fleshly…

Had I forgotten "Amores perros"? have I seriously been thinking that The Revenant would paint a philosophic wandering across marvellous landscapes with the help of Mother Nature ? Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu isn't Terrence Malick, where does this misunderstanding come from?

My today's expectations of good vibes maybe, or the medias and social networks' obsessions for Di Caprio's awards, announcing his fantastic interpretation, without telling anything or perhaps without having seen it ? No excuse, the movie is based on a true story, (Hugh Glass's) and I should have read it before, because I felt a bit… breathless in front of the screen…

The Revenant is rough, not complacent. It thrusts without care the audience into a trapper's environment, a hunter, a man tracking beasts for their skins and furs. Nature is the scene, not the subject. It is more about flesh here : the flesh of animals, the meat, the skins, the dead corpses sometimes hospitables… and the flesh of men : Fitzgerald lost his scalp, Hawk's face is burnt and Glass is hurt in his flesh and blood. His skin and heart are ripped forever.

And this, according to me, is the most interesting side of the film : Inarritu and Di Caprio managed to recall the fleshly or carnal gesture of fragile animals, hurt, walking to death. Glass survives like an animal but comes back relentlessly moved by the typical human desire of revenge. The indians have that in common with the settlers : human nature !

Without speaking of morals, we finally wonder what the purpose of the movie is (if there is one). All swines ? What a uneasy life to live at that time ? How difficult to survive in wild countries with wild men ? "Vengeance belongs to God" ? "God is a squirrel?" “When the storm comes, don’t look at the branches of the tree, look to the trunk…”

The direction, the shots and views, the camera movements are amazing. The audience gets sometimes jostled right in the middle of the violent scenes, stays sometimes static at the bedside of the character in agony, or flies gently into the sky. The make-ups and costumes are elaborated, and everything looks (and sounds !) realistic, accurate: no bad taste. Technically, Inarritu perfectly succeeded to shoot a wild movie in wild conditions. The interpretation is perfect too and the Oscars were deserved, but…

In that western genre, we've been used to smarter scripts and I've sometimes been looking for offbeat humours like in Tarantino's (the ironic humor avoid any moralizing) or the metaphors and references in the Jarmusch's Dead Man…

The Revenant is not the movie I expected, but it's a raw and wild movie and I liked it this way !